akhansari/EsBankAccount

This system is a Blazor WebAssembly application that implements an event-sourced bank account domain. It provides a user interface for managing bank accounts, supporting operations such as deposits, withdrawals, and account closure while enforcing business rules like balance thresholds. The architecture follows an Onion pattern with distinct domain, application, and infrastructure layers, utilizing the Equinox library for event sourcing and xUnit with Diffract for comprehensive testing.

The EsBankAccount application is introduced as a Blazor WebAssembly demo for event sourcing. It provides a user interface to manage bank accounts, allowing users to view a list of accounts, and perform deposit, withdraw, and close operations. The system enforces business rules such as preventing withdrawals that would drop the balance below a threshold and blocking the closure of accounts with negative balances. The architecture is split into Domain, App, and Infra layers, utilizing the Equinox library for event sourcing and a fake in-memory database for the read model.

EsBankAccount · high confidence

The repository is initialized with a functional event sourcing template for F\#, targeting .NET 6.0. This includes the core domain logic, a test suite using the Diffract assertion library, and documentation explaining the architecture (Onion, functional ES) and setup instructions.

(repo-wide) · high confidence

Added domain-level tests for bank account operations; Added initial test project entry point; Added startup integration tests for the bank account client.

The repository now includes two new project files: EsBankAccount/EsBankAccount.fsproj, a Blazor WebAssembly project using Bolero 0.18.16, Equinox.MemoryStore 3.0.5, and FsCodec.SystemTextJson 2.2.2; and EsBankAccount.Tests/EsBankAccount.Tests.fsproj, a test project referencing Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk 17.0.0, Diffract 0.1.1, xUnit 2.4.1, and xunit.runner.visualstudio 2.4.3.

(dependencies) · medium confidence

Written by watchdog.canine.dev from the codebase's own history, inside the signed delivery this page is composed from.

• CAI 55 → 56 (+1.1)
• Rubric changed (rubric-2026.08.19 → rubric-2026.09.15) — scores are not directly comparable.

• Architecture 69 → 69 (+0.0)
• Maturity 52 → 52 (+0.0)
• Readiness 50 → 50 (+0.0)
• Security 71 → 84 (+13.2)

• Dependency hygiene not measured — no packages were read
• High: security finding (details withheld)
• High: security finding (details withheld)
• High: security finding (details withheld)
• High: security finding (details withheld)
• High: security finding (details withheld)
• No exposed public API
• Test reliability not included
• complexity unreadable for .fs — churn × complexity hotspots could not be measured
• dormant codebase — no living knowledge left to concentrate

• Documentation: no installation or build instructions (README.md)
• Documentation: no usage examples (README.md)
• High: security finding (details withheld)
• High: security finding (details withheld)
• High: security finding (details withheld)
• High: security finding (details withheld)
• High: security finding (details withheld)
• High: security finding (details withheld)
• Medium: security finding (details withheld)
• Medium: security finding (details withheld)
• Medium: security finding (details withheld)
• Medium: security finding (details withheld)
• No dependency advisory monitoring
• Workflow token permissions not restricted
• bus factor 1 — one contributor carries this repository

Written by watchdog.canine.dev from the codebase's own history, inside the signed delivery this page is composed from.

akhansari/EsBankAccount was measured the same way every project in this corpus was: the same rubric, at a pinned commit, with the result published in full. Point a surveyor at a repository you know and see whether you agree with it.