burakeregar/KotlinRxMvpArchitecture

This system appears to be a software project that is currently in a maintenance or documentation phase, as the entire recorded history consists solely of non-behavioral changes to documentation, configuration, and formatting. There are no user-facing features or functional code changes in the provided history.

A non-behavioural change (docs/formatting/config) in (repo-wide) — 11 commits, 5 files.

(repo-wide) · high confidence · unverified

Written by watchdog.canine.dev from the codebase's own history, inside the signed delivery this page is composed from.

• CAI 47 → 49 (+2.0)
• Rubric changed (rubric-2026.08.19 → rubric-2026.09.15) — scores are not directly comparable.

• Code Health 100 → 100 (+0.0)
• Architecture 98 (new)
• Maturity 44 → 44 (+0.0)
• Readiness 24 → 24 (+0.0)
• Security 100 → 100 (+0.0)

• Coverage not included — suite not readable by the collector
• Dependency hygiene not measured — dependency manifest found but not parsed for hygiene
• No exposed public API
• Test reliability not included
• change coupling unreadable for .kt — no production change history could be paired for this repository's own source
• early-stage repository — too little history to judge knowledge freshness
• git history depth insufficient
• single-maintainer — knowledge-concentration (bus factor) risk

• Dependency hygiene PARTLY measured — Maven/Gradle declarations read, no dependency graph resolved
• Documentation: no contributor guidance (README.md)
• Documentation: no installation or build instructions (README.md)
• Documentation: no usage examples (README.md)
• No ADRs found

Written by watchdog.canine.dev from the codebase's own history, inside the signed delivery this page is composed from.

burakeregar/KotlinRxMvpArchitecture was measured the same way every project in this corpus was: the same rubric, at a pinned commit, with the result published in full. Point a surveyor at a repository you know and see whether you agree with it.