dinhquan/iOSCleanArchitecture

This system is an iOS application built on a Clean Architecture, designed to display and browse articles through a list and detail view interface. It leverages reactive programming with RxSwift and manages network requests and image caching via third-party libraries like Alamofire and Kingfisher. The codebase includes a comprehensive test suite covering both unit and UI testing to ensure reliability.

The project now includes the primary \project.pbxproj\ file, which defines the target structure, file references, and framework dependencies (including RxSwift, Alamofire, and Kingfisher). Additionally, new build schemes have been introduced for the main application and its test suite, enabling direct build and test execution within Xcode.

CleanArchitecture.xcodeproj · high confidence

Introduced new UI components and view controllers for the article feature, including \ArticleListViewController\ and \ArticleDetailViewController\ with their respective view models. The update also adds common reusable utilities such as \Storyboard\ for safe view controller instantiation, \ActivityIndicator\ and \ErrorTracker\ for reactive state management, and extension methods for \UITableView\ to simplify cell dequeuing and registration.

CleanArchitecture · high confidence

Added initial UI test suite for the CleanArchitecture project; Added unit tests for ArticleListViewModel.

The Swift Package Manager resolved dependencies have been updated. The project now pins Alamofire to version 5.4.1, Kingfisher to 6.1.1, RxDataSources to 5.0.0, and RxSwift to 6.1.0.

(dependencies) · medium confidence

Written by watchdog.canine.dev from the codebase's own history, inside the signed delivery this page is composed from.

• CAI 54 → 54 (+0.1)
• Rubric changed (rubric-2026.08.19 → rubric-2026.09.15) — scores are not directly comparable.

• Code Health 100 → 99 (-0.6)
• Architecture 100 → 94 (-5.7)
• Maturity 59 → 63 (+4.2)
• Readiness 24 → 26 (+1.2)
• Security 95 → 95 (+0.0)

• Coverage not included — suite not readable by the collector
• Dependency hygiene not measured — dependency manifest found but not parsed for hygiene
• No exposed public API
• Scanner failed to run — not a clean result
• Test reliability not included
• complexity unreadable for .swift — churn × complexity hotspots could not be measured
• early-stage repository — too little history to judge knowledge freshness
• git history depth insufficient
• single-maintainer — knowledge-concentration (bus factor) risk

• Assertions commented out: testExample (CleanArchitectureUITests/CleanArchitectureUITests.swift)
• Documentation: no contributor guidance (README.md)
• Documentation: no installation or build instructions (README.md)
• Documentation: no usage examples (README.md)
• Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) (CleanArchitecture/Data/Network/RestAPI.swift)
• Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) (CleanArchitecture/Data/Network/RestAPI.swift)
• Leaked secret: high-entropy-secret (CleanArchitecture/Data/Config/Config.swift)
• No ADRs found
• No assertions: testLaunchPerformance (CleanArchitectureUITests/CleanArchitectureUITests.swift)
• Outdated: alamofire
• Outdated: kingfisher
• Outdated: rxdatasources
• Outdated: rxswift
• Test project verifies nothing: CleanArchitectureUITests (CleanArchitectureUITests/CleanArchitectureUITests.swift)
• TodoComment (CleanArchitecture/Data/Config/Config.swift)

Written by watchdog.canine.dev from the codebase's own history, inside the signed delivery this page is composed from.

dinhquan/iOSCleanArchitecture was measured the same way every project in this corpus was: the same rubric, at a pinned commit, with the result published in full. Point a surveyor at a repository you know and see whether you agree with it.