evolutionary-architecture/evolutionary-architecture-by-example

61.9

Adequate · 29 July 2026

1.4k

lines of production code

2

measurements over time

How this codebase got here

This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings — which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it — are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.

Score

CAI 60 → 62 (+2.1)
Rubric changed (rubric-2026.08.17 → rubric-2026.08.18) — scores are not directly comparable.

Lenses

Code Health 88 → 89 (+0.5)
Architecture 68 → 68 (-0.1)
Maturity 71 → 69 (-1.8)
Readiness 57 → 57 (+0.0)
Security 54 → 61 (+6.4)
Event-Driven 72 → 72 (+0.0)

Resolved (80)

Change coupling: SignContractEndpoint.cs ↔ MarkPassAsExpiredEndpoint.cs (Chapter-1-initial-architecture/Src/Fitnet/Contracts/SignContract/SignContractEndpoint.cs)
Decision is generic ('We decided to use Docker') with no context (why not a different container tool) or trade-offs beyond the listed consequences (Chapter-1-initial-architecture/Docs/ArchitectureDecisionLog/0006-use-docker.adoc)
Decision is generic ('We decided to use Docker') with no context (why not a different container tool) or trade-offs beyond the listed consequences (Chapter-2-modules-separation/Docs/ArchitectureDecisionLog/0006-use-docker.adoc)
Decision is generic ('We decided to use Docker') with no context (why not a different container tool) or trade-offs beyond the listed consequences (Chapter-3-microservice-extraction/Docs/ArchitectureDecisionLog/0006-use-docker.adoc)
Decision is generic ('We decided to use Docker') with no context (why not a different container tool) or trade-offs beyond the listed consequences (Chapter-4-applying-tactical-domain-driven-design/Docs/ArchitectureDecisionLog/0006-use-docker.adoc)
High IaC: DS-0002 (Chapter-3-microservice-extraction/Fitnet.Contracts/Src/Dockerfile)
High IaC: DS-0002 (Chapter-3-microservice-extraction/Fitnet/Src/Dockerfile)
High IaC: DS-0002 (Chapter-4-applying-tactical-domain-driven-design/Fitnet.Contracts/Src/Dockerfile)
High IaC: DS-0002 (Chapter-4-applying-tactical-domain-driven-design/Fitnet/Src/Dockerfile)
High: security finding (details withheld)
High: security finding (details withheld)
High: security finding (details withheld)
High: security finding (details withheld)
High: security finding (details withheld)
High: security finding (details withheld)
High: security finding (details withheld)
High: security finding (details withheld)
High: security finding (details withheld)
High: security finding (details withheld)
High: security finding (details withheld)
…and 60 more

New (4)

Build action pinned to a mutable branch
Secret passed as a command-line argument
Test runner surfaced no tests
Workflow token permissions not restricted

API surface

Unchanged — 1 HTTP endpoints

Written by watchdog.canine.dev from the codebase's own history, inside the signed delivery this page is composed from.

Survey your own repository

evolutionary-architecture/evolutionary-architecture-by-example was measured the same way every project in this corpus was: the same rubric, at a pinned commit, with the result published in full. Point a surveyor at a repository you know and see whether you agree with it.

About this page

The score is its most recent published measurement, taken on 29 July 2026 at a pinned commit. It is not a live figure and does not change until the project is measured again.
Measured at commit 04c3f717d96f505d8355fac517c780904982d5bd — the exact code this score is about.
Scored under rubric-2026.08.18 — the same rubric and the same method as every other entry in this index.
Measured by watchdog.canine.dev using codehealth-analyzer latest.