Skip to content
CAI
Software that uses CAICheck a score

flyeralarm/onboarding

47.6

Weak · 20 September 2026

80

lines of production code

Go

primary language

4

measurements over time

CAI band scale
CAI trend line
CAI lens gauges

What this system is

This repository serves as an open-source educational curriculum for software engineering, covering topics from web basics to specific technologies like PHP, Kotlin, and Kafka. It includes a Go-based utility for automated link verification to maintain the integrity of external resources referenced in the documentation. The project is licensed under the MIT License.

Features

The repository now includes a comprehensive 'Advanced Curriculum For The Software Craftsman' (README.md) covering topics from web basics and design patterns to specific technologies like PHP, Kotlin, and Kafka, along with an MIT License (LICENSE.md). To maintain the quality of these external resources, a new Go-based URL verification tool (verify\_urls.go) has been added to automatically check for broken links in the documentation, supporting exception lists for known timeouts or bot-protected sites.

(repo-wide) · high confidence

Written by watchdog.canine.dev from the codebase's own history, inside the signed delivery this page is composed from.

How this codebase got here

This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings — which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it — are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.

Score

  • CAI 51 → 48 (-3.2)
  • Rubric changed (rubric-2026.08.17 → rubric-2026.09.15) — scores are not directly comparable.

Lenses

  • Code Health 99 → 99 (+0.6)
  • Architecture 69 → 69 (+0.0)
  • Maturity 55 → 41 (-14.0)
  • Readiness 33 → 33 (+0.0)
  • Security 85 → 90 (+5.2)

Resolved (5)

  • Dependency hygiene not measured — no supported dependency manifest was read
  • High: security finding (details withheld)
  • High: security finding (details withheld)
  • No exposed public API
  • Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1

New (10)

  • Documentation: no installation or build instructions (README.md)
  • Documentation: no usage examples (README.md)
  • High: security finding (details withheld)
  • High: security finding (details withheld)
  • Medium: security finding (details withheld)
  • Medium: security finding (details withheld)
  • Medium: security finding (details withheld)
  • Medium: security finding (details withheld)
  • Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1
  • Workflow token permissions not restricted

Written by watchdog.canine.dev from the codebase's own history, inside the signed delivery this page is composed from.

Survey your own repository

flyeralarm/onboarding was measured the same way every project in this corpus was: the same rubric, at a pinned commit, with the result published in full. Point a surveyor at a repository you know and see whether you agree with it.

About this page

  • The score is its most recent published measurement, taken on 20 September 2026 at a pinned commit. It is not a live figure and does not change until the project is measured again.
  • Measured at commit 98adbdac4dd464a12f4dda0c463a41ef6c5feeae — the exact code this score is about.
  • Scored under rubric-2026.09.15 — the same rubric and the same method as every other entry in this index.
  • Measured by watchdog.canine.dev using codehealth-analyzer preprod-28e75b8e3254.