jdiazromeral/django-ddd
64.0
Adequate · 22 September 2026
143
lines of production code
Python
primary language
7
measurements over time
What this system is
This system is a Django-based application that has been modernized to support Python 3.11 and Django 4.1. The codebase has been refactored to remove legacy configuration patterns, such as default app configs, and now explicitly registers application components. The project also includes an updated test suite to align with these framework upgrades.
Behavioural changes
Django dependency upgraded to 4.1 and Python support updated to 3.11
The project now requires Django 4.1 or higher and Python 3.11 or higher, reflecting a significant upgrade to the Django framework and a shift in supported Python versions. The package configuration has been consolidated into setup.py, removing the separate setup.cfg, and the Dockerfile has been updated to use Python 3.11. Additionally, the README has been updated to reflect the new installation method via pip and explicit INSTALLED\_APPS configuration.
(repo-wide) · high confidence
Fixes missing newline and removes default\_app\_config in Django app template
The Django app template was updated to ensure the apps.py template file ends with a newline character, preventing potential issues with some tools or editors. Additionally, the default\_app\config setting was removed from the \\init\\_.py file, as this configuration is no longer required for modern Django versions.
_django\ddd · high confidence
Removed default app configuration in dummy\_app
The default application configuration for the dummy\_app package has been removed. This means the app will no longer automatically load the 'DummyAppConfig' from the 'dummy\_app.infrastructure.apps' module upon initialization.
_dummy\app · high confidence
Test coverage
Updated test configuration for Django app registration and model fields
The test suite's Django settings were updated to explicitly register the 'dummy\_app' using its AppConfig class ('dummy\_app.infrastructure.apps.DummyAppConfig') and added a default auto field type for Django models ('BigAutoField').
tests · high confidence
Dependencies
Upgrade Python and Django to modern versions
The project's Python version is updated from 3.8 to 3.11, and Django is upgraded from 3.0.5 to 4.1.7, requiring a significant migration to the newer framework version.
(dependencies) · high confidence
Written by watchdog.canine.dev from the codebase's own history, inside the signed delivery this page is composed from.
How this codebase got here
This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings — which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it — are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.
Score
- CAI 59 → 64 (+4.6)
- Rubric changed (rubric-2026.08.19 → rubric-2026.09.15) — scores are not directly comparable.
Lenses
- Code Health 100 → 100 (+0.0)
- Architecture 69 → 69 (+0.0)
- Maturity 82 → 82 (+0.0)
- Readiness 46 → 53 (+7.3)
- Security 62 → 70 (+8.5)
Resolved (21)
- Coverage not included — suite not readable by the collector
- Critical CVE: [GHSA redacted] (Pipfile.lock)
- Dependency hygiene not measured — no supported dependency manifest was read
- High CVE: [GHSA redacted] (Pipfile.lock)
- High CVE: [GHSA redacted] (Pipfile.lock)
- High CVE: [GHSA redacted] (Pipfile.lock)
- High: security finding (details withheld)
- High: security finding (details withheld)
- High: security finding (details withheld)
- High: security finding (details withheld)
- Medium CVE: [GHSA redacted] (Pipfile.lock)
- Medium CVE: [GHSA redacted] (Pipfile.lock)
- Medium CVE: [GHSA redacted] (Pipfile.lock)
- Medium CVE: [GHSA redacted] (Pipfile.lock)
- Medium IaC: CKV_DOCKER_3 (Dockerfile)
- Medium vulnerability: [GHSA redacted] (Pipfile.lock)
- No exposed public API
- Test reliability not included
- complexity unreadable for .py — churn × complexity hotspots could not be measured
- no production source files with tracked history to analyse
- …and 1 more
New (21)
- Critical CVE: [GHSA redacted] (Pipfile.lock)
- Documentation: no contributor guidance (README.md)
- High CVE: [GHSA redacted] (Pipfile.lock)
- High CVE: [GHSA redacted] (Pipfile.lock)
- High CVE: [GHSA redacted] (Pipfile.lock)
- High: security finding (details withheld)
- High: security finding (details withheld)
- High: security finding (details withheld)
- High: security finding (details withheld)
- High: security finding (details withheld)
- High: security finding (details withheld)
- Medium CVE: [GHSA redacted] (Pipfile.lock)
- Medium CVE: [GHSA redacted] (Pipfile.lock)
- Medium CVE: [GHSA redacted] (Pipfile.lock)
- Medium CVE: [GHSA redacted] (Pipfile.lock)
- Medium IaC: WD-DOCKER-0003 (Dockerfile)
- Medium IaC: WD-DOCKER-0004 (Dockerfile)
- Medium vulnerability: [GHSA redacted] (Pipfile.lock)
- Medium: security finding (details withheld)
- Medium: security finding (details withheld)
- …and 1 more
Written by watchdog.canine.dev from the codebase's own history, inside the signed delivery this page is composed from.
Survey your own repository
jdiazromeral/django-ddd was measured the same way every project in this corpus was: the same rubric, at a pinned commit, with the result published in full. Point a surveyor at a repository you know and see whether you agree with it.
About this page
- The score is its most recent published measurement, taken on 22 September 2026 at a pinned commit. It is not a live figure and does not change until the project is measured again.
- Measured at commit db4310b1e736dc9ba7f40ff6ec477073568343de — the exact code this score is about.
- Scored under rubric-2026.09.15 — the same rubric and the same method as every other entry in this index.
- Measured by watchdog.canine.dev using codehealth-analyzer preprod-821afab8930d.