Skip to content
CAI
Software that uses CAICheck a score

Mansurisodev/office_store_getX

53.0

Adequate · 21 September 2026

1.3k

lines of production code

Dart

with C++, C

4

measurements over time

CAI band scale
CAI trend line
CAI lens gauges

What this system is

This is an Office Furniture Store application built with Dart, designed to demonstrate multiple state management approaches including GetX, Cubit, Bloc, and Provider. The system provides a complete user interface for browsing and managing furniture, supported by comprehensive project documentation and standardized licensing.

Behavioural changes

Updated project documentation and license

The project's README has been significantly expanded to include a detailed description of the Office Furniture Store app, complete with screenshots, feature lists, and directory structures for multiple state management implementations (GetX, Cubit, Bloc, and Provider). Additionally, the project license was changed from BSD 2-Clause to MIT.

(repo-wide) · high confidence

Dependencies

Updates to pubspec.yaml configuration

The pubspec.yaml file was updated to adjust the Dart SDK version constraint to '\>=2.18.2 \<3.0.0', and the font asset paths for the Poppins typeface were reformatted with adjusted indentation.

(dependencies) · medium confidence

Written by watchdog.canine.dev from the codebase's own history, inside the signed delivery this page is composed from.

How this codebase got here

Score

  • CAI 53 → 53 (-0.4)
  • Rubric changed (rubric-2026.08.19 → rubric-2026.09.15) — scores are not directly comparable.

Lenses

  • Code Health 100 → 100 (+0.0)
  • Architecture 100 → 89 (-11.4)
  • Maturity 54 → 59 (+4.7)
  • Readiness 24 → 24 (+0.0)
  • Security 100 → 100 (+0.0)
  • Domain Modelling 100 → 100 (+0.0)

Resolved (8)

  • Coverage not included — suite not readable by the collector
  • Dependency hygiene not measured — dependency manifest found but not parsed for hygiene
  • No exposed public API
  • Test reliability not included
  • complexity unreadable for .dart, .kt, .swift — churn × complexity hotspots could not be measured
  • early-stage repository — too few commits for a meaningful bus factor
  • early-stage repository — too little history to judge knowledge freshness
  • git history depth insufficient

New (7)

  • Dependency hygiene PARTLY measured — Maven/Gradle declarations read, no dependency graph resolved
  • Documentation: no contributor guidance (README.md)
  • Documentation: no installation or build instructions (README.md)
  • Documentation: no licence statement
  • Documentation: no usage examples (README.md)
  • Low cohesion: OfficeFurnitureController (LCOM4 4) (lib/src/controller/office_furniture_controller.dart)
  • No ADRs found

Written by watchdog.canine.dev from the codebase's own history, inside the signed delivery this page is composed from.

Survey your own repository

Mansurisodev/office_store_getX was measured the same way every project in this corpus was: the same rubric, at a pinned commit, with the result published in full. Point a surveyor at a repository you know and see whether you agree with it.

About this page

  • The score is its most recent published measurement, taken on 21 September 2026 at a pinned commit. It is not a live figure and does not change until the project is measured again.
  • Measured at commit cef2153c16728ff72d5473360adb1c2d2a67f823 — the exact code this score is about.
  • Scored under rubric-2026.09.15 — the same rubric and the same method as every other entry in this index.
  • Measured by watchdog.canine.dev using codehealth-analyzer preprod-fa71c66cabd8.