Skip to content
CAI
Software that uses CAICheck a score

playercatboy/Automator

41.9

Weak · 28 September 2026

381

lines of production code

VB.NET

primary language

4

measurements over time

CAI band scale
CAI trend line
CAI lens gauges

What this system is

Features

Initial release of the Automator application

The Automator application is introduced as a new tool for creating and managing Ducky Script files. The release includes the main window interface with hotkeys for inserting code snippets, a file management system that saves output as .ino files using UTF-8 encoding without a BOM, and a DuckyScript module for parsing and converting Ducky Script strings. The application targets .NET Framework 4.5.2 and utilizes the MaterialDesignInXaml library for its user interface styling.

Automator · high confidence

Dependencies

Added .NET 4.5.2 WPF project with MaterialDesign and Newtonsoft.Json dependencies

The Automator project was added as a .NET Framework 4.5.2 WPF application, establishing the core build structure and referencing the MaterialDesign (v1.1.3 and v2.4.0.1044) and Newtonsoft.Json (v13.0.1) NuGet packages.

(dependencies) · high confidence

Written by watchdog.canine.dev from the codebase's own history, inside the signed delivery this page is composed from.

How this codebase got here

Score

  • CAI 38 → 42 (+3.5)
  • Rubric changed (rubric-2026.08.15 → rubric-2026.09.16) — scores are not directly comparable.

Lenses

  • Code Health 95 → 92 (-2.8)
  • Architecture 69 → 69 (+0.0)
  • Maturity 33 → 36 (+2.8)
  • Readiness 17 → 23 (+6.4)
  • Security 100 → 100 (+0.0)

Resolved (9)

  • Build did not complete in the analyzer
  • No exposed public API
  • Shell project: Automator (Automator/Automator/Automator.vbproj)
  • The README mentions .Net Framework 4.5 and Visual Studio 2017 for compiling but does not state which operating system (Windows) it targets or how to install. (README.md)
  • XML-doc coverage: Automator (Automator/Automator/Automator.vbproj)
  • early-stage repository — too few commits for a meaningful bus factor
  • early-stage repository — too little history to judge knowledge freshness
  • git history depth insufficient
  • git history depth insufficient

New (5)

  • Build failed
  • Documentation: no installation or build instructions (README.md)
  • Documentation: no project overview (README.md)
  • Documentation: no usage examples (README.md)
  • No ADRs found

Written by watchdog.canine.dev from the codebase's own history, inside the signed delivery this page is composed from.

Survey your own repository

playercatboy/Automator was measured the same way every project in this corpus was: the same rubric, at a pinned commit, with the result published in full. Point a surveyor at a repository you know and see whether you agree with it.

About this page

  • The score is its most recent published measurement, taken on 28 September 2026 at a pinned commit. It is not a live figure and does not change until the project is measured again.
  • Measured at commit 680fa3c37f6be21082304754ba8f57bf6ed6eeaa — the exact code this score is about.
  • Scored under rubric-2026.09.16 — the same rubric and the same method as every other entry in this index.
  • Measured by watchdog.canine.dev using codehealth-analyzer preprod-24a00d372a4b.