Skip to content
CAI
Software that uses CAICheck a score

rafaelfgx/Microservices

69.4

Adequate · 21 September 2026

3.2k

lines of production code

Java

primary language

4

measurements over time

CAI band scale
CAI trend line
CAI lens gauges

What this system is

This system appears to be a minimal or maintenance-focused codebase with no documented functional features. The history consists solely of a large-scale behavioral change affecting 273 files and routine dependency updates across 8 manifests. Without further context, it is unclear what specific domain or purpose this system serves.

Behavioural changes

1 commit (0 fixes) modifying (repo-wide)

A change to existing behaviour in (repo-wide) — 1 commit, 273 files.

(repo-wide) · low confidence · unverified

Dependencies

1 commit updating dependencies (8 manifests)

A dependency / build maintenance change in (dependencies) — 1 commit, 8 files.

(dependencies) · medium confidence · unverified

Written by watchdog.canine.dev from the codebase's own history, inside the signed delivery this page is composed from.

How this codebase got here

This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings — which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it — are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.

Score

  • CAI 67 → 69 (+2.0)
  • Rubric changed (rubric-2026.08.19 → rubric-2026.09.15) — scores are not directly comparable.

Lenses

  • Code Health 100 → 100 (+0.0)
  • Architecture 100 → 95 (-5.4)
  • Maturity 70 → 70 (+0.0)
  • Readiness 54 → 56 (+2.3)
  • Security 78 → 88 (+9.5)

Resolved (15)

  • Coverage not included — suite not readable by the collector
  • Dependency hygiene not measured — dependency manifest found but not parsed for hygiene
  • High: security finding (details withheld)
  • High: security finding (details withheld)
  • High: security finding (details withheld)
  • High: security finding (details withheld)
  • High: security finding (details withheld)
  • High: security finding (details withheld)
  • No exposed public API
  • Scanner failed to run — not a clean result
  • Test reliability not included
  • early-stage repository — too little history to judge knowledge freshness
  • git history depth insufficient
  • single-commit history — no usable git history window to measure hotspots
  • single-maintainer — knowledge-concentration (bus factor) risk

New (61)

  • Dependency hygiene PARTLY measured — Maven/Gradle declarations read, no dependency graph resolved
  • Documentation: no installation or build instructions (README.md)
  • Documentation: no usage examples (README.md)
  • High IaC: WD-COMPOSE-0001 (.docker/docker-compose.yaml)
  • High IaC: WD-COMPOSE-0002 (.docker/docker-compose.yaml)
  • High IaC: WD-COMPOSE-0002 (.docker/docker-compose.yaml)
  • High IaC: WD-COMPOSE-0002 (.docker/docker-compose.yaml)
  • High IaC: WD-COMPOSE-0002 (.docker/docker-compose.yaml)
  • High IaC: WD-COMPOSE-0002 (.docker/docker-compose.yaml)
  • High IaC: WD-COMPOSE-0002 (.docker/docker-compose.yaml)
  • High IaC: WD-COMPOSE-0002 (.docker/docker-compose.yaml)
  • High IaC: WD-COMPOSE-0002 (.docker/docker-compose.yaml)
  • High: security finding (details withheld)
  • High: security finding (details withheld)
  • High: security finding (details withheld)
  • High: security finding (details withheld)
  • High: security finding (details withheld)
  • High: security finding (details withheld)
  • Medium IaC: WD-COMPOSE-0002 (.docker/docker-compose.yaml)
  • Medium IaC: WD-COMPOSE-0002 (.docker/docker-compose.yaml)
  • …and 41 more

Changes since last survey

  • 1 commits — 1 feature/other, 0 fixes

By area

  • starter/src — 1 commit

Notable commits

  • change: .

Written by watchdog.canine.dev from the codebase's own history, inside the signed delivery this page is composed from.

Survey your own repository

rafaelfgx/Microservices was measured the same way every project in this corpus was: the same rubric, at a pinned commit, with the result published in full. Point a surveyor at a repository you know and see whether you agree with it.

About this page

  • The score is its most recent published measurement, taken on 21 September 2026 at a pinned commit. It is not a live figure and does not change until the project is measured again.
  • Measured at commit 720b5e6f3177a9914a84eb6127f053475fdc3e3b — the exact code this score is about.
  • Scored under rubric-2026.09.15 — the same rubric and the same method as every other entry in this index.
  • Measured by watchdog.canine.dev using codehealth-analyzer preprod-fa71c66cabd8.