ricardoAntolin/androidKotlinCleanArchitecture

This system appears to be a codebase with minimal recent activity, consisting solely of non-behavioral updates to documentation, configuration, and formatting. There are no user-facing changes or functional modifications in the provided history.

A non-behavioural change (docs/formatting/config) in (repo-wide) — 4 commits, 2 files.

(repo-wide) · high confidence · unverified

Written by watchdog.canine.dev from the codebase's own history, inside the signed delivery this page is composed from.

• CAI 67 → 47 (-19.5)
• Rubric changed (rubric-2026.08.19 → rubric-2026.09.15) — scores are not directly comparable.

• Code Health 100 → 100 (+0.0)
• Architecture 100 → 72 (-28.0)
• Maturity 59 → 59 (+0.0)
• Readiness 52 → 24 (-28.4)
• Security 100 → 74 (-25.6)

• Coverage not included — suite not readable by the collector
• Dependency hygiene not measured — dependency manifest found but not parsed for hygiene
• No exposed public API
• Test reliability not included
• early-stage repository — too little history to judge knowledge freshness
• git history depth insufficient
• git history depth insufficient
• single-maintainer — knowledge-concentration (bus factor) risk

• Dependency hygiene PARTLY measured — Maven/Gradle declarations read, no dependency graph resolved
• Documentation: no usage examples (README.md)
• High secret: WD-SECRET-0004 (buildsystem/debug.keystore)
• Leaked secret: private-key-store (buildsystem/debug.keystore)
• No ADRs found
• No SBOM
• No build provenance
• No dependency advisory monitoring

Written by watchdog.canine.dev from the codebase's own history, inside the signed delivery this page is composed from.

ricardoAntolin/androidKotlinCleanArchitecture was measured the same way every project in this corpus was: the same rubric, at a pinned commit, with the result published in full. Point a surveyor at a repository you know and see whether you agree with it.